Last Updated:
Thursday, August 7, 2008 20:58
GMT Bush
Lectures Chinese Government As It Apes His Own "Free Speech Zone"
Policy In a scenario resembling that of the pot calling
the kettle black, President Bush has hit out at the Chinese government
for its crackdown on dissent during the Olympics, while the Communist
regime is aping a "free speech zone" policy created by Bush's
own administration.
White
House memo exposes Rove knew of problems with anthrax vaccine The Department of Defense continued its controversial
mandatory anthrax vaccinations program despite high ranking Bush administration
officials acknowledging there were problems with the vaccine within
months of the Bush administration taking office—well before the
9/11 attacks and the October 2001 anthrax letters.
'2
US aircraft carriers headed for Gulf'
Two additional United States naval aircraft carriers are heading to
the Gulf and the Red Sea, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Kuwait
Times.
Anti-War
Website Operator Threatened By Armed Thugs The operator of a leading alternative news and
strongly anti-war website has become the target of nefarious thugs apparently
in the employ of the U.S. government who have continually harassed him
and ordered him to shut down his website.
Did
Britain make a secret pact with Mahdy Army? The British army made a secret deal with the
Mahdy Army which kept UK forces out of the Basra clashes last March,
leaving Iraqi forces to fight alone, The Times newspaper reported on
Tuesday.
Olympic
athletes sign letter urging China to respect Tibet freedoms More than 40 athletes taking part in the Beijing
Olympics have today signed an open letter addressed to China's government
urging it to respect human rights and freedom of religion, particularly
in Tibet.
Do
You Feel Safe Now?
Now that military officers selected by the Bush Pentagon have reached
a split verdict convicting Salim Hamdan, a onetime driver for Osama
bin Laden, of supporting terrorism, but innocent of terrorist conspiracy,
do you feel safe?
Mark
Roberts: 9/11 "Debunker" or just Dishonest? I wonder why Mark Roberts and other apologists
for the 9/11 official story never go near facts such as these? I'll
have to assume it's because they can't be "debunked".