Reaction Was "Controlled Demolition"
Rarely highlighted footage of an NBC news anchor commenting that the collapse of the twin towers was by no means accidental and that it was a "planned" event, emphasizes the point that before the official mind control script was introduced and parroted forevermore, everybody's first reaction was "controlled demolition."
The NBC anchor featured in this clip is simply reacting to the events he is witnessing with common sense in stating that the collapse of the trade towers was obviously a planned event and by no means an accident or a simple consequence of jets hitting the buildings.
"This was clearly -- the way the structure is collapsing -- this was the result of something that was planned."
"This is not, it's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way."
"How they accomplished this, we don't know. But clearly this is what happened."
This is what I wrote in the late afternoon of September 11, 2001.
"The collapse of the World Trade Center towers is also perplexing. They clearly imploded as if being demolished by carefully placed bombs within the building. The explanation that the aircraft fuel from the Boeing caused the implosion doesn't tally with the footage of the event. Surely such a method would produce a more inconsistent and graphic explosion? The building collapsed symmetrically."
CBS News' Dan Rather also commented that the collapse of building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, resembled a deliberate attempt to demolish the structure using incendiary devices.
"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."
NBC's Pat Dawson reported the working hypothesis of the FDNY in the immediate aftermath of the towers' collapse.
"The chief of safety of the Fire Department of New York City told me he received word of a possibility of a secondary device -- that is another bomb going off. He tries to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said that there was another explosion which took place and according to his theory, he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building."
MSNBC news anchor Rick Sanchez reported that police had found suspicious devices in and around the WTC area and that the secondary explosions, which were reported by numerous survivors, were thought by police to be bombs.
"Police have found what they believe to be a suspicious device and they fear that it may lead to another explosion."
"I spoke with some police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me they have reason to believe that one of the explosions at the World Trade Center aside the ones caused by the planes, may have been caused by a van that was parked on the building that may have had an explosive device in it."
During an exchange between ABC's Peter Jennings
and reporter Don Dahler following the collapse of the north tower, the
first assumption is again that controlled demolition must have been
used to take down the building.
"The entire building has just collapsed as if a demolition team set off....when you see the old demolition of these old buildings. It just folded in on itself and it is not there anymore."
Peter Jennings: "If you wish to bring, if anyone has ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows, that you're going to do this you have to get at the, at the under infrastructure of a building and bring it down."
Police chiefs, fire department heads, veteran news anchors, eyewitnesses on the ground - everyone's first reaction was "controlled demolition" because the events suggested nothing else. In the first few hours of 9/11 - bombs in the buildings was almost as equally understood and accepted as the fact that planes had hit the towers.
Just as with the Oklahoma City Bombing - reports of multiple explosions and bombs were commonplace - but the scriptwriters had to concoct a fable that matched the explanation of Timothy McVeigh and a single fertilizer truck bomb. Similarly, anything that contradicted the already decided upon explanation of 9/11, no matter that almost every eyewitness interviewed as the attack unfolded reported bombs, was cut from the final edit of the propaganda.
History is written by the winners - if the government had announced that gargoyles from the planet Jupiter had destroyed the towers with mind rays - the mainstream media would have lined up, saluted, licked boots, and supported that explanation.
The sheer magnitude of trying to overturn such a gargantuan lie as the official story of 9/11 rested on demolishing the power of the initial mind control - the first explanation of what happened is always provided by the government and it always remains as the seal of authenticity, no matter how preposterous. Not enough people dared question the official version of 9/11 in the hours and days after the attack and that's why it stuck.
If the 9/11 truth movement has achieved anything it is the diluting of the influence and credibility the government has in brainwashing the public with its "official version" in the immediate aftermath of major events. Which thankfully makes the much vaunted "next 9/11" less likely in the short-term to happen.
Please help our fight against the New World Order by giving a donation. As bandwidth costs increase, the only way we can stay online and expand is with your support. Please consider giving a monthly or one-off donation for whatever you can afford. You can pay securely by either credit card or Paypal. Click here to donate.